The dad of murdered student Inge Lotz says a bloody towel and ornamental hammer are key to cracking baffling case.
|||
Cape Town - Three months since the father of slain Stellenbosch University student Inge Lotz asked the police for a bloodstained towel he believes holds the key to finding her killer, neither the police nor the Hawks were certain on Friday of its whereabouts.
This emerged in response to Weekend Argus inquiries after Jan Lotz said this week, ahead of the 10th anniversary of his daughter’s murder on Monday, that the towel could help solve the crime in as little as a matter of weeks.
Asked to comment, police spokesman Lieutenant-Colonel Andrè Traut said the matter had been handed over to the Hawks. The police were no longer investigating and he could say nothing more.
Hawks spokesman Brigadier Hangwani Mulaudzi said the Hawks had been handed the docket only in the past two weeks.
In that time they had tried to see whether there was “anything we can do”, but to no avail.
On the whereabouts of the bloodied towel, Mulaudzi said the police station initially involved should know what had become of the exhibits from the trial.
Lotz is of the opinion that the towel will help prove that an ornamental hammer, an item previously identified as the murder weapon, was in her flat the day she was killed.
Monday marks 10 years since Inge, 22, was found murdered in her Stellenbosch apartment, with wounds to the top of her head and stab wounds to her chest. Her killing shocked the campus community and stunned people across the country.
Interest in the case intensified when, a few months after Inge’s murder, her boyfriend Fred van der Vyver was arrested for it.
But, after a protracted trial, he was acquitted in the Western Cape High Court.
Her father has declared that he would not rest until his daughter’s killer was brought to justice.
This week Lotz told Weekend Argus that despite a decade having lapsed, it felt as if his daughter had been murdered yesterday.
“I believe that the mystery of Inge’s tragic death can be unravelled within weeks, but it would require the will, determination and commitment of the Department of National Prosecution (the National Prosecuting Authority) to reopen the murder inquiry.
“This was an exceptionally serious crime, a brutal murder of a young girl in the sanctuary of her own home in a secure residential complex, and in broad daylight. Her killer(s) arrived and left unnoticed having sanitised the crime scene and taking the murder weapon(s) with.”
Lotz provided Weekend Argus with a photograph of a bloodstained towel which he said was from the official police dossier. The towel had been left on the bathroom floor of Inge’s flat by her murderer.
“An imprint on this substrate, in Inge’s blood, bears a remarkable resemblance to an ornamental hammer that was part of the evidence in the (police) investigation.
“From this very clear picture it is possible to deduce beyond any reasonable doubt, that the ornamental hammer, or to be completely generous, a similar one, was in Stellenbosch on the afternoon of the murder,” he said.
An ornamental hammer, which had a bottle opener instead of a claw, featured prominently in Van Der Vyver’s trial, with the State alleging that such a hammer was the murder weapon.
Lotz’s parents had given him an ornamental hammer as a Christmas gift.
Forensic pathology professor Gert Saayman testified that it was unlikely Van der Vyver’s hammer caused Inge’s wounds.
Van Der Vyver this week declined to comment on how he was doing 10 years after Inge’s murder, nor on the possibility that marks from an ornamental hammer were on the towel.
Lotz said his attorney Johan Jordaan had written to the police asking that the bloodied towel be returned to him (Lotz).
An extract from the letter said: “It has become obvious that the South African Police Service has no idea what has happened to crucial objects of evidence in an unsolved murder case.”
It also said that, if necessary, Lotz would take legal action to get the towel.
Lotz, who had hired ace detective Piet Byleveld to investigate Inge’s murder, told Weekend Argus he was not seeking revenge.
“I do, however, believe that I have the right to know the truth. Consequently, I shall never accept the status quo and I shall not rest until I know by whom, and why, on the afternoon of 16 March, 2005, in the town of Stellenbosch, this beautiful young life was snuffed out so horrifically.”
A few years ago amateur investigators Calvin and Thomas Mollett started probing Inge’s murder.
This week Thomas Mollett told Weekend Argus they had noticed various marks and imprints on the bloodied towel which were similar to the shape of a unique ornamental hammer.
“We since obtained a similar hammer, which is very scarce, and could reproduce the marks.
“And then, very importantly, we also found an impression of the bottle-opener side on the couch (on which) Inge was murdered,” he said.
They got hold of the similar hammer last week after attempts to source one in South Africa failed.
It had to be ordered from overseas.
Thomas Mollett said other matters they were probing included whether someone known to Inge had another cellphone number, which that person had intentionally concealed.
The person’s identity is known to Weekend Argus.
Meanwhile, a
source with knowledge of the case said the towel was allegedly handed to a police investigator after forensic testing on it was completed.
Asked this week whether the murder probe would ever be reopened, the National Prosecuting Authority referred to a previous statement issued on December 5, 2013.
It said after Van der Vyver’s acquittal in November 2007 that police had consulted with the director of public prosecutions’ office and followed up leads that may have led to identifying Inge’s murderer.
The statement said that, after representations from Inge’s family, including a report from retired physics professor Kobus Visser, it had decided no further investigation was required.
“It is not considered that there are any other suspects outstanding,” it said.
Despite this, friends and supporters of Inge continue pushing for further investigations.
An online petition, asking for the case to be reopened, has been signed by 1 120 people.
Weekend Argus